HOC member login

Message Board

Message board > Engines > Pilot SE accomodation

Message 22 of 22
Posted by member Aad Mulder on Tuesday 17 August 2010

Hello Dominique, Most interesting how you created a third birth in the cockpit. Could you possibly mail to me some photo's, so that I can copy it? Thanks and kind regards Aad Mulder@ hetnet.nl

Add your comment

Message 21 of 22
Posted by member Roger Beese on Saturday 20 December 2008

Hi Andy and Dominic I have purchased a Honda 5hp long shaft BF5A The mounting is not easy on the 1994 Hp family because of the high aft port and starboard quarters The tiller is not clearing the stern I have a trem bracket any info before I start making holes

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 20 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola Gribbin on Saturday 20 December 2008

Hi Roger. I would say don't panic. I had the same problem you describe when I first got our aux o/b. However, we got around it. We have the Yamaha longshaft 4hp version of your auxillary. If you undo the shaft brake, the whole engine should rotate 180 degrees to allow the tiller to hang out in thin air, rather than up against the transom/stern where it will indeed restrict the tilt. On ours we can now have the auxillary prop well clear of the water, and the tiller never fouling the stern or aft gunnel. Have a try anyhow. Dom.

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 19 of 22
Posted by member Andy Mcmullan on Thursday 27 November 2008

Hi Roger I like Tohatsu outboards. These are really good value and are available at discounted prices on Boats and Outboards and Ebay. They have an excellent reputation for reliability. They are often rebadged Yamaha's. You can get 'Sail Drive' high thrust versions in the lower 4-stroke sizes. From memory they are pretty light too. Maybe worth a look. Cheers Andy

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 18 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola on Wednesday 26 November 2008

Couple less bottles of chablis on board will balance that equation out just fine! Assuming you have not got loads of other kit hanging off the transom its insignificant in my opinion. Go Honda I reckon. There must be some deals or negotiating leverage at present? Dominic.

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 17 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola Gribbin on Monday 24 November 2008

Hi Roger. Sorry. I totally overlooked measuring up the auxiliary attachments on our Pilot. I'll endeavor to do it this afternoon. As to whether to opt for a Mariner 4 or Honda 5, clearly its something of a personal choice. Myself,I do believe in the reliability of Honda 4 strokes and the extra bit of horsepower is a bonus. Just check its not significantly heavier than the Mariner version. Dominic.

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 16 of 22
Posted by member Roger Beese on Monday 24 November 2008

Hi Dominic Mariner 4 25kg Honda 5 27.5 kg not significant ? Roger

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 15 of 22
Posted by member Roger Beese on Thursday 20 November 2008

Hi Dominic Thanks for all the info ??? Mariner 4 or Honda 5 ??? ??? Regards Roger

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 14 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola Gribbin on Monday 17 November 2008

Hi Roger. Many thanks. Ref: Pilot auxilliary outboard transom bracket....I have replaced our original unit but not fitted from scratch i.e where no holes existed. I do know you will need a long-leg version of your auxillary. We use a Yamaha 4hp four stroke, directly linked via a T-piece off the main petrol supply hose. Instantly available when you need it. Make sure you buy a sprung drop down version capable of taking the not inconsiderable strains of an auxillary hanging off the transom. Also, make sure the bracket has all stainless bolts/washers etc. Some of the parts of our's are now corroding badly (I had assumed it was fit for sea use). Shackle the outboard to the transom. Plastimo to a handy stainless 1 metre version with stainless carabiners. Our Jura Pilot is currently on the drive so I'll pop out this eveining and take some measurements for you. The arrangement on ours is standard and portside. The outboard bracket was factory fitted by Hardy. To fit from new, the job looks easy enough. Dominic. P.S Lucky you. Cardiff Bay is gateway to some great crusing. Even North Devon is a straightforward jaunt on a good day in a Pilot, with majical Lundy beyond!

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 13 of 22
Posted by member Roger Beese on Sunday 16 November 2008

Hi Domonic and Nicola I think your contribution to HOC is tremendous As a relativly new member 3 or 4 yrs I find your articles very helpful and have saved me a lot time and fruitless research and on that point.... I am about to move my HP (1994)from river Tewkesbury AVON to Cardiff Bay and need to equip my superb FOREVER J I have been recommended by a former Hardy agent to try a 4hp Mariner sailmate as an auxiliary outboard to back up my Honda 50hp I also need details on how to fit the auxiliary position= mounting-heights etc Comments would be greatly appreciated

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 12 of 22
Posted by member Andy Mcmullan on Thursday 13 November 2008

Hi Kevin, If you take one of the seats off, you may find that it has the same mounting holes as a new seat. I got new seats for my last Hardy and was of the opinion that the mounting holes were a standard configuration, ie 4 holes in a square type pattern that juat accepted large screws. Cheers Andy

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 11 of 22
Posted by member Kevin Austin on Tuesday 11 November 2008

I have just purchased a G Hardy Seawing 194 (1990). I would like to replace the cockpit / helm seats but they sit on rails over the fibre glass lockers. A pedestal systen wont fit due to the lockers. Does anyone know where I can bye replacement seats to fit, or any ideas. Please Email me if you do and thanks for your help. Kevin

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 10 of 22
Posted by member Andy Mcmullan on Saturday 27 October 2007

Dominic & Damian Yes I agree on the River Pilot. Thanks for the suggestion Damian. I can see the appeal of the River Pilot but need the strength of the extra bulkhead for sea use. I appreciate all the feedback on this. Cheers Andy

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 9 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola Gribbin on Friday 26 October 2007

Hi Andy To point one yes, thats how we sleep (port to stbd) all the time and there is no need for an infill. I think I would call us medium sized adults (5' 11" and 5' 7"). Its actually a comfortable bedding arrangement up front in this way but our upholstrey is rather heavily used now and needs re-foaming. Our baby, Sam (17 mnths)sleeps under the prow at the very head of the fwd cabin. Thomas (2.7 yrs)sleep in the 1/4 berth.That leaves the wheelhouse for Daddy to retreat to on mild evenings! I beleive the SE hailed the phased ending of the Family Pilot and as you know was the 'run-out' model for the Pilot itself, prior to the Bosun. I guess there was a period of cross over with the F.P still available as a lower spec model.I thought the F.P had largely been superceded by the SE by 1995/6.In reference to 'Damian's suggestions......That may be true but the big problem is its a 'River Pilot' and not the standard Pilot designed for more rugged sea use. Unlike the River Pilot, The Family Pilot and SE are strengthened for sea use with the addition of a critically important forward bulkhead. Given this is I assume the intended end usage of this boat, best to go with what its designed for.Having on numerous occasions heard our Family Pilot straining under pressure as it flies up and over or through waves, I know where I would be looking. In even a reasonable sized sea any boat's hull/superstructure takes a beating, especially so when at speed.For sea use, stick with what the designers intended. Hope this helps Dom.

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 8 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola Gribbin on Thursday 25 October 2007

In both the Pilot and SE I think you can get two berths in the wheelhouse, just. There is not enough room for a double. One berth across the rear bulkheads (adult) and one down the centre cabin sole of the wheelhouse between the helmsman's seat base and the cooker/sink mouldings. This is very much a 'junior' berth and I would want to sleep away from the fuel tank well also. A low volume 'Thermarest' inflatable camping/hiking mattress would be ideal to use in this space. Ref. Bosun co-pilot seat weighting I agree. The weight distribution when planing in a Pilot is critical. Get it wrong and you can fall awkwardly off the plane. Stabilty is aided tremendously by trim tabs but it is still an important consideration. Presumably Hardy recognised this and developed the Bosun's set up. We have a made our own co-pilot seat set up for our Family Pilot and use a side-saddle style floating safety cushion seated on the sink top (back to wheelhouse sides)with chromed brass fold down foot pegs attached to the side of the sink moulding for resting feet on. Works well for us and there is a well placed grab handle fitted as standard for the occupant to hold on to. So in total we are talking 2 in the stern and two (comfortably) up front in the SE and Bosun. The 1/4 berth is the added adavantage of the Family Pilot. Hope this helps Domiic.

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 7 of 22
Posted by member Andy Mcmullan on Thursday 25 October 2007

Dominic Thanks once again for the helpful info. I am building up a pretty decent picture now of this boat. I was just looking at an old Hardy Pilot order specification sheet that suggests that there is the option to sleep port to starboard across the double in the saloon, rather than bow to stern, for two people. Do you think this is feasible for medium sized adults? Could the infill be extended here to make more sleeping space in this area? I found it interesting that the Hardy Pilot ordering document lists the SE as being available to order along with the Family Pilot, and lists the extras of the SE, for example, sliding aluminium framed wheel house windows, an additional aluminium port hole on the port side and stancions and guard wires. I had thought that the 'SE' replaced the 'Family' Pilot. I suppose then that the 'Family' tag points towards the smaller extra berth. Was the Family Pilot then in production right up to the Bosun which started to be produced in 1999? Cheers Andy

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 6 of 22
Posted by member Damian on Thursday 25 October 2007

Andy, Forget about buying a Pilot SE and get yourself a River Pilot. You will comfortably get another double berth on the floor between the patio doors and helm/galley bulkheads when you fold the helm/co pilot seats away. That way you'll have 5 good berths.

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 5 of 22
Posted by member Andy Mcmullan on Friday 19 October 2007

Dominic That's useful info, cheers. Getting back to the SE accomodation and the berth that is possible to rig up in the wheelhouse, how wide do you think that this could roughly be? I have noticed that some Family Pilot ads indicate a 'double' in this area. Could a wider berth be rigged up? I need space for myself and a seven year old so 1.5 berths would do I suppose, for now anyway. Also, might there be room for a narrow camp bed in the area betwen the pilot and co-pilot seats, as an alternative? Although the SE has less dedicated accomodation, I think that the seating in the wheelhouse for a pilot and co-pilot side by side makes alot of sense, especially for weight distribution. Is there anyone who has an SE (or Bosun) and has squeezed some extra sleeping space in? Cheers Andy

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 4 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola Gribbin on Tuesday 16 October 2007

Hi Andy 1.Yes you are correct. Hunt around and you can find some late model (94-ish) Family Pilots with white hulls. I agree they are rather nice and somewhat easier maintenance than the earlier blue type. 2. No, I have never needed to use transom wedges. As you say, with trim tabs, a large enough engine (70, 75 or 90) and power tilt on the o/board they are probably rendered unneccessary, certainly on a 1993 model such as ours. As far as I am aware, Hardy slightly lessened the angle of the Bosun's transom and changed the internal well shape quite considerably to better accomodate a larger outboard. This lesser angle has even further improved the attack angle for the outboard with improved planing performance on the Bosun. In fact, am I mistaken or have they adopted a full planing hull for the Bosun rather than a semi-displacement? Personally I prefer the sea keeping benefits of a semiu-displacement hull....the Hardy Pilot wasn't and never will be a speed boat in my opinion. 3. Osmosis-wise, I have not heard of Hardy generally having any particular history of osmosis problems. In fact, given their relatively over engineered GRP lay-ups maybe they are even less likely than some other equivalent/cheaper makes. They are famously bomb proof boats! Personally I would not be looking at untreated GRP boats earlier than 1990 and I'll probably be shot down for saying that. We had our 1993 hull in 2002 totally sandblasted then sealed to prevent future osmosis issues (she had had none I should add). If you know an older boat you are considering has had that treatment, then it may merit more attention. Remember hulls that have been in freshwater for long periods of time are more prone to osmosis that those in salt water. Ask about its mooring history. There are some lovely late model Pilots out there for sale, albeit intermittently but expect to part with £15K for really good one. Best wishes Dominic and Nicola

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 3 of 22
Posted by member Dominic And Nicola Gribbin on Monday 15 October 2007

Yes, Hardy sacrificed the 1/4 berth of the Family Pilot (under sink/cooker moulding) for a co-pilot seat and adjacent cooker. On the SE and Family Pilot an extra berth can fairly easily be created in the cockpit/wheelhouse by the creation of cross transom cushion bridging the floor lockers. Easily achieved with a piece of marine ply or mahogany over the petrol tank well. We have such a set up and its the most comfortable berth aboard in my opinion (not Nicola's I should add)....especially on balmy summer nights with the canopy sides up. I would imagine realistically, the SE is a 3 berth max layout. Dominic.

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 2 of 22
Posted by member Andy Mcmullan on Monday 15 October 2007

Dominic Thanks for the advice. I really need space for 3 adults and a child to sleep so I may be looking at a blue hull boat like yours. My Fishing 17 is blue and looks faded very quickly after buffing. That is why I primarly wanted a white hull. I have noticed a couple of white or (grey?) hull Pilots on Boats and Outboards that seem to be Family Pilots and not SE. One advertiser mentions that his is a special edition. Another query I have concerns the transom wedges. I think I have read in another post of yours that you use them. Are they strictly necessary if you have trim tabs and power trim? If you don't use them is the fit of the outboard against the transom compromised, or is it strictly a trim issue? Did Hardy design this out before the Bosun? I see on the forum that you can buy aluminium ones which would be a more acceptable solution than wood. Have you ever heard of any osmosis problems in Pilots? There are quite a few older boats for sale, but I am reluctant to go as far back as the mid eighties for this reason. My Fishing 17 is 1990 and is in fantastic condition, so I would like to get a similarly well looked after Pilot with a 75 Honda or 70 Suzuki ideally. Cheers Andy

Add your comment | ^Top

Message 1 of 22
Posted by member Andy Mcmullan on Saturday 13 October 2007

I intend to buy a Pilot SE but am wondering about the number of berths. I see that the older blue hull Pilot has 2 berths in the saloon plus an additional child size berth, then the option of 1 in the cockpit. Does the SE have the additionl small third birth in the saloon and is there scope to rig up an additional berth in the cockpit? I am looking at an outboard version boat. Cheers Andy

Add your comment | ^Top

You must be logged in to post to the Hardy Motor Boat Owners Club message board. Click here to login in. If you’re not yet a HOC member then why not join us today?